live.hackr

die romantische komödie

Web 2.0 Monday

am 7. November in Köln – das Wiki

Warum / Why
Web Montag – bringt Anwender, Entwickler, Gründer, Forscher, Pioniere, Designer und sonstige Interessenten zum Thema Web 2.0 (im weiteren Sinne) zusammen.

Themen / Topics
Technologie: Ajax, API, Atom, Collaboration, E-Democray, E-Learning, Emerging Technology, Feeds, FOAF, Folksonomy, Identity, Instant Messaging, Location-based Services, Long Tail, Microformats, Mobile, Multimodal Interactive (Wireless Voice), Open Source, Podcasting, Privacy, RFID, RSS, Search, Security, Semantisches Web, Social Bookmarking, Social Networks, Social Software, Spam, Syndication, Tags, Tagging, Voice over IP (VoIP), Web 2.0, Weblogs, Web Services, Wikis, Wireless, XFN
Business: Marketing, Perspektiven Deutschland (NRW, Südwest), Startups, transatlantischer Austausch (Deutschland-USA), Venture Finance …

(file under: keyword 2.0 spam)

(via Oliver Thylmann)

☍ 03.11.2005 # webmonday

Audiobook

Tom Coates zu BBC’s Annotatable Audio Project und ein Kommentar von Thomas Vanderwal

☍ 02.11.2005 /via @plasticbag # bbc coates

Facebook By Numbers

Zahlen zu Facebook

- 5M+ registered users
– coverage of 45% of US colleges (a total of 2,000 – representing 8M students)
– 80% penetration among students of colleges that are on the platform
– 10th most visited Internet site in the US
– 5.5B page/views a month (230M page/views a day)
– 8.5M unique visitors
– signing 20,000 new users a day
– repeat usage: daily 70%, weekly 85%, monthly 93% – can you think of another site that sees 93% of its registered users coming back every month ?

☍ 02.11.2005 # facebook

live

Mit dem Start von Microsoft Live erwarte ich mir in der näheren Zukunft ob des Namens / der URL dieses Blogs fantastische Zugriffszahlen, muss nur das Keyword Microsoft verstärkt aber natürlich unaufdringlich einfließen lassen.

Es läuft leider mit Firefox oder IE Mac (den ich mir extra deswegen heruntergeladen habe) noch nicht so wirklich, also nur ein Link zu einem Photo von Michael Arrington auf Flickr (das ganze Set ist lustig).

Die Begriffe:

  • Digital Lifestyle (TV and Movies, Music, Memories, Education, Games, Productivity, Communication)
  • Digital Workstyle (Spotting Trends for business intelligence, Presence, Unified Communication, Improving Personal Productivity, Insights and structured workflow, Team Collaboration, Optimizing supply chains)
  • und dazwischen: Maps/Travel Planning, Calendars/Scheduling, Finding Information, Buying/Selling.
☍ 02.11.2005 # microsoft

Übersättigung

Fred Wilson und Ross Mayfield zur Aufmerksamkeitsübersättigung und wie viele Feeds dem Menschen zumutbar sind (150).

Zitat eines Entwicklungspsychologen:

What information consumes is rather obvious: it consumes the attention of its recipients. Hence a wealth of information creates a poverty of attention, and a need to allocate that attention efficiently among the overabundance of information sources that might consume it.
(Computers, Communications and the Public Interest, pages 40-41, Martin Greenberger, ed., The Johns Hopkins Press, 1971.)

☍ 02.11.2005 # infoeconomy attention

Mini-hompy

Ich will ein Mini-hompy

(siehe Hypercortex)

☍ 02.11.2005 # hompy

Wikipedia gedruckt

Nicht unwitzige Wendung: die Encyclopaedia Britannica gibt nicht mehr es doch noch (danke Mathias) in Buchform (soweit ich weiss), Teile der Wikipedia könnten aber bald gedruckt werden, um sie auch in weniger vernetzten Ländern zugänglich zu machen.

siehe Reuters/Yahoo News

☍ 01.11.2005 # wikipedia

Microloans

Kiva – eine Plattform für Micro-kredite/loans.

By partnering with existing microfinance organizations and institutions, Kiva finds outstanding entrepreneurs who need loan funding. Our expert in-country staff works with these partner organizations to conduct due diligence on each business, and once approved, post each business’ profile on our website. This is where you come in. You can choose loan money online, using your credit card or Paypal, in increments as low as $25 toward the loan needs of a business. With your participation, Kiva gives entrepreneurs access to the capital they need to lift themselves out of poverty.

Sehr, sehr nett. Wenn’s was wird, bekommt man das Geld zurück, wenn nicht ist es eine Spende, lest euch das about durch.

☍ 01.11.2005 # kiva

iTags

Mary Hodder tüftelt gerade an einem Konzept namens iTags:

The idea is that a user could tag an object (photo, video, sound file, text or an entire blog post), where the tag, and the object, would then go out through the RSS feed or be spidered, with some additional information that doesn’t now exist in tags.

☍ 31.10.2005 # tags

Web 2.0 Sudoku

Web 2.0 Sudoku

☍ 31.10.2005 # web2.0 sudoku games

Future Study Wiki Raid

Heute ist übrigens der Future Study Wiki Raid

We would like to organize a global, 24-hour effort to add as much information regarding futures studies as we possibly can – and in as many languages as we can – to the Wikipedia on-line encyclopedia. We are asking for individuals to volunteer to describe or explain some specific aspect or sub-topic in futures studies, and then input that (or find an input buddy to add it) to Wikipedia.

☍ 31.10.2005 # misc

Was die Geschäftswelt von Open Source lernen kann

Amüsante Keynote von Paul Graham bei der OSCON 2005 (gibt es auch als Text hier).

(note to self: bzgl. der Selbstausbeutung überdenken)

ein paar zitate:

I think the most important of the new principles business has to learn is that people work a lot harder on stuff they like.

It was the narrowness of such channels that made professionals seem so superior to amateurs. There were only a few jobs as professional journalists, for example, so competition ensured the average journalist was fairly good. Whereas anyone can express opinions about current events in a bar. And so the average person expressing his opinions in a bar sounds like an idiot compared to a journalist writing about the subject.
On the Web, the barrier for publishing your ideas is even lower. You don’t have to buy a drink, and they even let kids in. Millions of people are publishing online, and the average level of what they’re writing, as you might expect, is not very good. This has led some in the media to conclude that blogs don’t present much of a threat— that blogs are just a fad.
Those in the print media who dismiss the writing online because of its low average quality are missing an important point: no one reads the average blog. In the old world of channels, it meant something to talk about average quality, because that’s what you were getting whether you liked it or not. But now you can read any writer you want. So the average quality of writing online isn’t what the print media are competing against. They’re competing against the best writing online.

And when I read, say, New York Times stories, I never reach them through the Times front page. Most I find through aggregators like Google News or Slashdot or Delicious. Aggregators show how much better you can do than the channel. The New York Times front page is a list of articles written by people who work for the New York Times. Delicious is a list of articles that are interesting.

The third big lesson we can learn from open source and blogging is that ideas can bubble up from the bottom, instead of flowing down from the top. Open source and blogging both work bottom-up: people make what they want, and the best stuff prevails.
Does this sound familiar? It’s the principle of a market economy. Ironically, though open source and blogs are done for free, those worlds resemble market economies, while most companies, for all their talk about the value of free markets, are run internally like communist states.
There are two forces that together steer design: ideas about what to do next, and the enforcement of quality. In the channel era, both flowed down from the top. For example, newspaper editors assigned stories to reporters, then edited what they wrote.
Open source and blogging show us things don’t have to work that way. Ideas and even the enforcement of quality can flow bottom-up. And in both cases the results are not merely acceptable, but better.

☍ 30.10.2005 /via @paulgraham # graham podcast

Der Triumph der Amoralität

Wolfgang Sommergut zu/gegen Nicholas Carr’s The amorality of Web 2.0

Mein Senf: Carr hat mit der Amoralität des Web 2.0 (auf eine von ihm nicht so gemeinte Weise) nicht so unrecht, weil sich die Geschäftsmodelle des Publizierens verschieben bzw. schon verschoben haben (siehe AdSense, Ebay, Amazon, AOL/Weblogs Inc., usw.), also weg von bezahlten, redaktionell erstellten Inhalten, hin zu dem grauenhaften Terminus ‘user generated content’ und den Vermarktungsstrukturen und Verwertungsinteressen, die sich darum gruppieren.

☍ 30.10.2005 # web2.0 ethics carr

Astronauten

Joel (on Software) on Web 2.0

Now it’s tagging and folksonomies and syndication, and we’re all supposed to fall in line with the theory that cool new stuff like Google Maps, Wikipedia, and Del.icio.us are somehow bigger than the sum of their parts. The Long Tail! Attention Economy! Creative Commons! Peer production! Web 2.0!

The term Web 2.0 particularly bugs me. It’s not a real concept. It has no meaning. It’s a big, vague, nebulous cloud of pure architectural nothingness. When people use the term Web 2.0, I always feel a little bit stupider for the rest of the day.



Not only that, the very 2.0 in Web 2.0 seems carefully crafted as a way to denegrate the clueless “Web 1.0” idiots, poor children, in the same way the first round of teenagers starting dotcoms in 1999 dissed their elders with the decade’s mantra, “They just don’t get it!”

Irgendwie ist das symptomatisch für ein ganzes Genre von Web 2.0 bashing nach dem Muster:

  • eine Unterstellung: and we’re all supposed to fall in line with the theory
  • ein Gefühl: When people use the term Web 2.0, I always feel a little bit stupider for the rest of the day.
  • eine Verweigerung: seems carefully crafted as a way to denegrate the clueless “Web 1.0” idiots
☍ 30.10.2005 # web2.0 antianalysis

Verdichtet

So konzentriert hab ich den Web 2.0 Diskurs auch noch nicht gesehen: Thomas Burg’s Reloaded.

☍ 30.10.2005 /via @randgaenge # web2.0 analysis

Die Sendung mit dem Tag

Oliver Wagner hat den Oktober zum Monat der Tags erklärt und ein paar ambitionierte Einträge verfasst:

(Teil 4 und 5 soll es noch geben, allerdings sind die schon überfällig)

☍ 29.10.2005 /via @agenturblog # tags tagging

Pac Manhatten

Pac Manhatten – eine urbane Reinterpretation des Klassikers aus den 80ern.

This analog version of Pac-man is being developed in NYU’s Interactive Telecommunications graduate program, in order to explore what happens when games are removed from their “little world” of tabletops, televisions and computers and placed in the larger “real world” of street corners, and cities.
A player dressed as Pac-man will run around the Washington square park area of Manhattan while attempting to collect all of the virtual “dots” that run the length of the streets. Four players dressed as the ghosts Inky, Blinky, Pinky and Clyde will attempt to catch Pac-man before all of the dots are collected.
Using cell-phone contact, Wi-Fi internet connections, and custom software designed by the Pac-Manhattan team, Pac-man and the ghosts will be tracked from a central location and their progress will be broadcast over the internet for viewers from around the world.

☍ 29.10.2005 # pacman

Getaggter Text

Für mich die Anwendung des Jahres (nicht sozial oder web 2.0-ig, aber doch mit Tags): Conrad Barski’s Tagging Mode für den Texteditor Emacs, der jedes beliebige Textdokument in eine tagbasiertes System transformiert.

☍ 29.10.2005 # emacs tagging

Digg

Digg hat gerade 2.8 Mio. Dollar Risikokapital – wie sagt man? – eingeschleust bekommen.

siehe SiliconBeat

☍ 29.10.2005 # digg funding

Chicago 1930

Fantastisch: die Chicago Crime Database mit (nicht Google aber) Maps.

☍ 28.10.2005 # maps crimes